User talk:2601:645:8300:C6D0:9097:AB7E:6821:8D97

OK on the block. I had just collapsed info that wasn't highly relevant to streamline discussion. I see that was taken off. As you can see from the last sign off -- I am happy to step away for 48 hours.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2601:645:8300:C6D0:9097:AB7E:6821:8D97 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I did not know that there was a clerk class and I was inappropriately clerking. When I did the collapses that were reverted, I was trying to streamline the discussion towards a consensus. If you read the copy at the end, you can see that I am done. I wanted to get people all the info so that some productive consensus could be formed before the protection expires. As it is, this block will restrict that and there will be no room for anything. I worked hard at the materials, this is not at all intentional flooding. This was deadline driven so that the user I invited to the talk page had the info they needed. Plus I am new. I do not intend to continue flooding.2601:645:8300:C6D0:9097:AB7E:6821:8D97 (talk) 20:51, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I have very little idea what you are talking about, but I do know that you have done a huge amount of disruptive editing, and that you have not made it clear that you understand what the problems were. JBW (talk) 22:08, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

changed mind

Hi - I realized I changed my mind about the block. That was only when I saw that NO ONE can edit, which shuts this down. I would be OK with me not editing (I am done). But it being closed down is problematic to consensus. Please review. @El C @Willanon @SpinningCeres

Also @SpinningCeres the protection has NOT expired yet. This block prevents the other user who had been removing comments to weigh in. Please look at the timing and how my hope was to have copy for others to edit. It's there. Just now no one can edit. I did not get consensus with you and Willanon. I felt beat up by both of you in this; and was surprised to see that this isn't necessarily how people work on Wikipedia. Please allow the other users to have the opportunity to collaborate if they chose. It's significant if they chose to add rather than just wholesale delete. I was called incompetent, inept, unwilling -- none of which are true. I was learning as fast as I could and producing so the weekend could be used for consensus. It was all good faith.

---