User talk:2A02:8388:6501:F00:2404:36E9:4232:BE81

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Xinjiang re-education camps. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You also made similar edits on Tiananmen square massacre. Doanri (talk) 12:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Doanri: Message text. Doanri (talk) 09:20, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All of my edits have been constructive and important and fully transparent and explained. Anti-Chinese/anti-communist vandals are known to use articles about China to inject their political agenda, using propaganda terminology, emotionally charged language and unsubstantiated allegations with the purpose of spreading disinformation against China. The name of the Wikipedia article "Xinjiang re-education camps" is in itself propaganda as the term "re-education" is charged language attempting to link the current training centers to the abolished 劳动教养 system. Their official name is "vocational training centers" and this is what they should be referred to.

"All of my edits have been constructive and important" really screams reasonableness and humility. Regardless, it is obvious that when a certain group's political interest is in uncovering certain facts, and another group's isn't, the former group and its allies will provide more information on those facts (e.g. the facilities bearing more similarities to concentration camps than to schools). Doanri (talk) 10:18, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits appear to be disruptive and I will ensure they will be reverted. Please refrain from any attempts at vandalism and do not revert any changes made by me in the future. If you disagree with my edits, you can start discussions on the talk page.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You also made similar reversals on Tiananmen square massacre.

AmericanPropagandaHunter (talk) 07:40, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

hehe Doanri (talk) 10:21, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits appear to be disruptive and I will ensure they will be reverted. Please refrain from any attempts at vandalism and do not revert any changes made by me in the future. If you disagree with my edits, you can start discussions on the talk page.

Please refrain from making any harrassing, non-constructive edits on my Wikipedia page or any talk pages I am engaged in. Any further engagement from you from now on is explicitly unwanted, so any comment you make that isn't directly addressing content on specific talk pages will be regarded as targeted harassment and I will request administrative assistance to deal with it.

This seems to be a very clear example of WP:NOTCONTENT. As you seem to have no actual arguments to make and aren't addressing the content of my edits, I accept your implied admission of guilt. Considering this, I don't think there is any point in continuing any conversation with you and trying to solve this amicably. Further trolling and any vandalism of my edits, too, will be reported to WP:ANI.

AmericanPropagandaHunter (talk) 12:34, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.