User talk:2A02:A420:25:5693:B0E9:EB17:F5CA:B99F

Hey there! I noticed that you left an uncivil and defamatory comment on another user's talk page, quoted here:

You really enjoy protecting domestic abusers don't you? You enjoy victims being put through torment and then blamed for it? Not only that, you have to absolutely ensure the abuser never gets anything bad written about them too. You probably convinced yourself you're on the right side of this and everyone else who sees this for what it is is either stupid or has an agenda. Whatever, hope you can still sleep at night knowing what you might be doing to someone.

You also left a pretty uncivil, accusatory, and nonconstructive comment on Talk:Amber Heard, quoted here:

So is TrueHeartSusie3 gonna be consistent and claim the findings of the new lawsuit will be relevant enough to include or are they just gonna reject it if it doesn't fit the narrative of Heard being utterly innocent? I have to specifically mention this editor because they have practically laid claim to this article and all articles related to the matter. All changes appear to have to go through them.

I do understand that Depp v. Heard is a controversial current event (and by extension, Johnny Depp and Amber Heard are controversial as well), but I wanted to remind you of Wikipedia's rules regarding personal attacks and maintaining civility in our interactions with other Wikipedia users. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Afddiary (talk) 12:34, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

---