User talk:2ndAmendment/Archive 1

Archive 1

John McCain Presidential Elligibility

My reply Arzel (talk) 13:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

See your talk page. 2ndAmendment (talk) 19:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of John McCain presidential eligibility

I have nominated John McCain presidential eligibility, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John McCain presidential eligibility. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- Naerii 19:44, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah the end run game. It is typical to nominate for AfD controversial topics in a vane attempt to squash any treatment of the subject. It is likely to fail, as this is a highly notable subject and deserves a separate article in order to maintain the integrity of Wikipedia. 2ndAmendment (talk) 19:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Auto-archiving

Thanks for adding this feature to Talk:Lyndon LaRouche. Could you also add it to Talk:Views of Lyndon LaRouche? --Niels Gade (talk) 05:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Done. It will kick in at midnight UTC. 2ndAmendment (talk) 14:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Glenn Jacobs talk page

I have replied to your question on the talk page of Glenn Jacobs. HairyPerry 18:28, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

You can't chnage a name until there is a concensus to change, so please don't do this to the Glenn Jacobs article again. Thank you, HairyPerry 19:36, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

I can if it is irrefutably correct. 2ndAmendment (talk) 20:50, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

You can't because the community has to come to a consensus, why don't you try reading about consensus, because apparently you have no idea what that word means. HairyPerry 14:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Look, if your real name is Hairy Perry, and someone writes a wikipedia article about you and calls it Harry Perry, and if I find irrefutable evidence as to the correct spelling of your name, I'm moving the article and answering questions later. Ditto for Glenn Jacobs. Consensus has nothing to do with what someones real name is. It's all about accuracy, not consensus. 2ndAmendment (talk) 02:31, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Look unless you have a consensus you can't change it, until a consensus is reached don't touch the name, by the way this whole encyclopedia is about consensus. So even if you know the information is incorrect, you can't touch it. HairyPerry 13:44, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

I will, however, point out that it is incorrect and ask you to support making the correction. 2ndAmendment (talk) 15:10, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

You just did it again man, you can't do that for the third time. I will not support the correction, because the correction is incorrect. Don't do this again or you will be reported to the admins. HairyPerry 15:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Ask Mr. Kane what his real name is. Until you do that you have no reason to doubt that it is Glenn. That's what's on his campaign contributions. 2ndAmendment (talk) 16:19, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Listen since you want to be a dick, why don't you ask GLENN Jacobs what his real name is. Those Contributions could be from anybody on the Internet, plus there unreliable. Let the process go through, even though everybody is opposing, but anyway. If you keep changing Glenn, you will be reported to the admins and most likely blocked. HairyPerry 16:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

I don't have to ask him. The Wresting News Desk has his name correct as Glenn.[1][2] Kane endorsed Ron Paul, and the story about that has his name as Glenn.[3] There is no one in the country named Glen Jacobs who has made any contributions to any campaign,[4] and Glenn Jacobs contributed $2200 to the Ron Paul campaign (the maximum anyone can contribute is $2300), which is what you might expect from an endorsement (putting your money where your mouth is).[5] And no, contributions can not come from "anyone on the internet". All campaign contributions, even a penny, can only come from US citizens or "permanent resident aliens", and must state your address, your occupation, and your employer if over $200. And your name, which in Kane's case, was clearly given as Glenn Jacobs. Google has 12,700 hits for Glenn Jacobs and 81,600 incorrect ones for "Glen" Jacobs, which is why I waited to find a definitive answer before requesting the name change. Remember, I was asked to fix his name on Wikipedia - by someone who claimed to know that it was wrong. I'm just doing due diligence to find out if it really is wrong, and it clearly is. 2ndAmendment (talk) 18:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Maybe there is more Google hits on that name because its CORRECT jackass. I'm done talking to you dude, if your not gonna talk reasonable sense. HairyPerry 18:14, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Like I said, you have to weigh the source of each. The campaign contributions are an irrefutable source. In view of those you would have to arrest Kane if you thought his name was really Glen. If you have any that you think are more reliable I would love to see them. What happens is one person gets it wrong and everyone else copies off of them, although in the midst of that there are a few who do get it right. You can certainly remember in school everyone getting a question wrong? Does that wrong answer make it right? Not a chance. And save the rude remarks for the ring. I'm not your problem, I'm your solution. 2ndAmendment (talk) 19:14, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

You are not nobodys solution just a pain in there ass, as you can see there is all kinds of people on Wikipedia who oppose your idea so just get over it. No this is more like when the people go to cheat off the smart kid and the snitch tells on them and gets them all failed and yur the snitch. I don't wrestle I can't save the rude remarks for the ring. My name is Rodney spelled just like that and Glenn is spelled just like that, until you can prove otherwise as in a reliable resource. HairyPerry 03:07, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, I didn't see all the contributions that you presented. Glenn is the right name now that I look back. Sorry that I doubted it...HairyPerry 13:41, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Apology accepted. I had no clue who he was and when I researched it, at first there was no clear indication that it was Glenn; but enough doubt to pursue it further, until I found the campaign contributions, and the rest was just documentation that Wikipedia could use. 2ndAmendment (talk) 14:57, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Good work, my deepest apologies again. Hey, would you mind if I put you on my Wikifriends? HairyPerry 15:23, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Go right ahead. 2ndAmendment (talk) 22:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC)