User talk:37.162.1.39

Hey there

Hello.

You just made two undo's of a user by the name of @Weatherextremes: without any edit summary. Generally, only clear vandalism is reverted without a summary of the revert.

Could you clear things up with a reason for the revert, as Weather's edits didn't seem like vandalism?

Thanks, EggRoll97 (talk) 09:00, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@EggRoll97: I explained in the talk page, and I will copy-paste the explanation down here too. For the record, this school is not recognized in South Africa --37.162.1.39 (talk) 09:12, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

____________________

It is not identical, the above document does not call UoPeople fraudulent. This is how you interpret it using a non-neutral language in POV tone. The document merely suggests that UoPeople is not licenced in South Africa and South Africa only adding that it is however licenced in the US. By reverting repeatedly you are vandalizing the article Weatherextremes (talk) 15:18, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's an official document: it's not "vandalizing". That fact that you don't agree with that document is another story. The title is clear: DHET WARNING ON CLONED AND FRAUDULENT ONLINE UNIVERSITIES (and universities is a plural word — two universities — not singular). --37.162.1.39 (talk) 08:54, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted to the more balanced version and I have given a fair warning that I will report this editor Weatherextremes (talk) 14:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, you have deleted another sourced statement, with official statistics from the US department of education.--37.162.1.39 (talk) 08:54, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@EggRoll97: Hi I am weatherextremes. Could you check the talk page of University of the People article and help with this user? Weatherextremes (talk) 09:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To both of you

@Weatherextremes: and @37.162.1.39:, I would really encourage that this go through mediation or another dispute resolution method, as the current discussion has only led to (from what I can see) a lot of bickering and no agreement on anything. As for the threats of reporting each other, that would more or less just lead to mutually assured destruction, rather than actual results.

If either of you needs my help again, just ping me with the replyto template. Thanks, EggRoll97 (talk) 09:24, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.