User talk:47.214.122.108

July 2023

Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Glory (1989 film), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 19:53, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Advise & Consent, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 07:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

All the information I added to the Advise and Consent article when I created the section differences from the book was information found in the published novel of which I own the copy I cited. Nothing which I referenced cannot be found there and I included it as a reference. What specific portions were deemed to be original research?

Thank you. 47.214.122.108 (talk) 13:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The entire section is original research - it reads as your personal analysis of the novel and the film. WP:OR "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that reaches or implies a conclusion not stated by the sources", a reliable source (other than the novel itself) that analyzes the differences between the novel and the film needs to be cited. Waxworker (talk) 15:40, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"...a reliable source (other than the novel itself) that analyzes the differences between the novel and the film needs to be cited."

I see. Well, that seems ridiculously bureaucratic to me when all one has to do is watch the movie and read the book and the differences are clear to see. But I get wanting to make sure things are accurate. But it's too much work for too little return, at least for me. Maybe someone else will think differently. Anyway. Thank you for clarifying. 47.214.122.108 (talk) 02:12, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.