Jump to content

User talk:49.178.155.14

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

PwC

[edit]

Hi 49.178.155.14

That's already posted. See previous paragraph. 1.43.41.96 (talk) 06:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

yes but the previous paragraph states that they "will be". My paragraph states that they have already been. 49.178.155.14 (talk) 06:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, yeah, OK. But if you read the company's statement: https://www.pwc.com.au/media/2023/pwc-australia-exits-eight-partners-for-professional-or-governance-breaches.html
I think I'm trying to say they weren't 'sacked'. It seems they have a 'Partnership Agreement' and can't just be sacked. That's why I included 'process started under the Partnership Agreement to remove them from the partnership'. The statement named twelve people. Four partners left early in the scandal, another four left more recently. That leaves four with the 'process started under the Partnership Agreement to remove them'. Actually I should have included this. 1.43.41.96 (talk) 07:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]