User talk:65.35.249.125

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.

April 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Saint Andrew's Cross (BDSM) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SeaphotoTalk 06:20, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (65.35.249.125) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! ˉˉanetode╦╩ 03:43, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Joseph Maraachli case, you may be blocked from editing. NYyankees51 (talk) 17:25, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Joseph Maraachli case, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NYyankees51 (talk) 01:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Daniel Case (talk) 03:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for for going straight back to the disruptive editing that caused the last block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 21:41, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Deal with the Devil. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 01:08, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You've already been blocked once for disruptive editing at Joseph Maracchli case, and you'll be blocked again if you continue doing it at Frank Pavone. NYyankees51 (talk) 02:30, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

are you proud to be propaganda tool puppet of those pedophiles?

well. i got news for you altar boy. this is free encyclopedia not a propaganda tool for your religion. mariachi case should have been removed.its not notable. 65.35.249.125 (talk) 05:07, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Frank Pavone. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - DVdm (talk) 10:14, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Note You might also consider toning down your comments on talk pages and edit summaries. Examples:

"fuck pope"
"sourced material back. fucking vegetable was never breating on his own after procedure"
"did you even read my post? THAT IS NOT A NAME OF CHARLES UNIVERSITY IN PRAGUE! How hard is it to comprehend"
"this vegetable is not notable. only know by pro-life propaganda puppets"

This is generally not appreciated. We try to write an encyclopedia here in a collaborative way. Pease consider? Thank you. DVdm (talk) 10:23, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Joseph Maraachli case, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Referring to this edit with this rationale. This was not the first time you did this. Please stop. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 10:26, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Frank Pavone, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - DVdm (talk) 12:41, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Octagon-warning.svg

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of one week as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Daniel Case (talk) 15:12, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

unblock[edit]

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

65.35.249.125 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribs deleted contribscreation log change block settingsunblockfilter log)


Request reason:

absolutely NO page blanking or random text. seems like block by pro-lifers is more political than protecting wiki. I have sourced my material (with RELIABLE SOURCE) before being blocked. NYyankees51 should not have any say in this , since he he is engaged in personal edit warring with me65.35.249.125 (talk) 18:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See WP:GAB for some acceptable unblock reasons. EdJohnston (talk) 18:48, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

If you don't like being blocked, stop being uncivil, adhere to WP:NPOV, use reliable sources, stop edit warring, and stop your combative WP:BATTLEGROUND attitude. NYyankees51 (talk) 18:42, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

František Mrázek[edit]

Thanks for your copyedit, 65.35.249.125. The article has a better flow and you didn't change the meaning of the content. I appreciate it. Best regards. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 06:58, 10 January 2012 (UTC)