Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 17 Kids and Counting, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 19:42, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from 17 Kids and Counting. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the . Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. You brought up the issue of ages not being used in any other reality show. Just to let you know, reasons like "It happens on other pages." and "It doesn't happen on other pages." are never good reasons for inclusion or removal. A consensus was reached about keeping the ages listed. If you disagree with that, bring it up on the talk page, give your reasons for why you believe it should be removed using policies/guidelines to back up your reasoning, and change consensus. Thank you. 132 03:39, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 17 Kids and Counting, you will be blocked from editing. See the talk page! Again, "It doesn't happen on other pages." is NOT a sufficient reason for removal! 132 14:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
You cannot use synthesis to prove a point. Your first source for the title has an incorrect airdate. Just because the second source has a date does not mean that it is tied to the first source automatically. That is synthesis, and it is not allowed under any circumstance. It's basically original research. If TV Guide was so sure of that information, why is it that they have not added it to their episode guide list? Neither has MSN, and the trailer is available on The CW (who hasn't updated their episode list either). The title, though it probably will be "Infamous", has not be officially recognized by the CW yet. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 20:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- First, it's still synthesis. Second, it was a fan who used the title "Infamous", not the reporter, or anyone actually connected to the show. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 21:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to 17 Kids and Counting. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. One note on the talk page using tired, old reasons that aren't sufficient for a mass removal is not gaining consensus. 132 20:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.