Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 21:10, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Priapus, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ElationAviation (talk) 02:47, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
Hey they, I'm gonna go ahead and assume you're using Huggle, but [recent change] wasn't actually an act of vandalism, but instead a change in wording. I can understand the concern, especially considering I didn't make any notes, but I'm just letting you know. I'm actually a registered user, but sometimes Wikipedia logs me out and I don't realize it until after I make large edits, and find out I was posting from my IP instead. Either way, just giving you a heads up. If this were a situation where you manually reverted my edit because you disagreed with it, and added the vandalism notification to my page, than instead try discussing it on my talk page or on the articles talk page first. Regards. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 02:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)