User talk:67.237.113.168

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Insert-signature.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:21, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

In case you are not the (topic)-banned editor WillBildUnion (talk · contribs):
Nuvola apps important.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Talk:Caesarion. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Arthur Rubin (talk) 12:30, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010[edit]

Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Talk:Caesarion. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Empty Buffer (talk) 12:33, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Actually the only thing I did was restore the title of the subsection I created.  It is discussion not censorship, their edit changes the scope and intent of the reason the section was created. Despite haveing removed a multi-year dialogue.  So why does the revisionist take precedent over the original? 67.237.113.168 (talk) 22:37, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Puppeter template.svg

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WillBildUnion for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 12:44, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Talk page comments[edit]

Please do not change other editors' talk page comments, as you have done with Talk:Caesarion. ... discospinster talk 20:06, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Talk:Caesarion. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Empty Buffer (talk) 22:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Talk:Caesarion. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Empty Buffer (talk) 22:26, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Stop x nuvola with clock.svg
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for disruptive editing. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 22:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Do not refactor the talk page comments of other editors. It's that simple. There are very limited instances where this practice is allowed. Please read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines during your time off. Thanks Tiderolls 22:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)