User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search



Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address ( is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! TJRC (talk) 15:44, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Cowboy Trap and Cowboy Builders[edit]

To be honest, I can't remember ever adding that ((+_+)), very strange. No there seems to be no connection (apart from the subject of course). FM talk to me | show contributions ]  19:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Ok. (talk) 03:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

thank you for your comment at[edit]

Your support would be very much appreciated, as far as I understand, a "support !vote" would help as noted in — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 07:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

You're not supposed to WP:CANVASS. (talk) 11:37, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

South Tibet/ Arunachal Pradesh / Arunachal Pradesh dispute / South Tibet dispute[edit]

As a participant to previous discussions at the South Tibet/ Arunachal Pradesh / Arunachal Pradesh dispute / South Tibet dispute talk page, you might be interested to participate to the following poll. Thanks, --Pseudois (talk) 04:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposal to split Jeremy Bamber[edit]

Exok objects to the closure of the discussion about whether to split Jeremy Bamber into two articles — one about the murders and one a biography. He has requested that I make a formal proposal to split the articles on the talk page. I'm very sorry to ask this, but it would be appreciated if everyone who commented at the BLPN here or on the talk page could offer their opinion again at Talk:Jeremy_Bamber#Proposal_to_split_this_article_into_a_murders_article_and_a_biography. (Also, for some reason, that link isn't going directly to the subsection, so please scroll up a little to find it.) Many thanks, SlimVirgin TALK|CONTRIBS 21:48, 20 February 2012 (UTC)