User talk:71.206.67.22

September 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:52, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 71.206.67.22. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:52, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Partial block from Booker T. Washington Senior High School (Miami, Florida)[edit]

You have been blocked from editing certain areas of the encyclopedia for a period of one week for promotional editing; likely conflict of interest. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 03:00, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.206.67.22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I guess 2 people by the names of IP? and and El C find it strange that a black highschools page is being updated? There is nothing to cheers about i have worked hard on this research and demand to know why it can not be provided? "I have provided nothing but my hard work and time as football enthusiast and reporter to complete a lot of hard research and information to do this, the person editing my edits is not even reading the edits and removing information that was there prior to me even starting, they are not reading just blocking and saying promotoion when this has nothing to do with any company nor do i have personal ties, is it because there is someone taking time to update a black highschool's citable information?? that has nothing to do with any company or promotion or conflict of interest its simply handwork and the truth of my research, its the truth. an employer, you guys are just sending me generic emails and blocking me this is ridicoulous. 71.206.67.22 (talk) 03:33, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First, you were warned below but continued. Second, this edit added some promotional language (i.e. "Following a spectacular 2013 National championship run, the Tornadoes' faced a lot of doubt and adversity with first time head coach Tim Harris Jr. regarding the team's expectation on the 2014 schedule. However, in Tornadoe fashion, Booker T Washington continued a dominant and impressive Dynasty ..." That's not neutral; it sounds like something you'd read on the school's website) and removed the {{reflist}} template. There's nothing wrong with updating an article that needs updating; it's just that there's a way to do it and not only did you not do it, you ignored the warnings telling you stop and discuss what you were doing. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

New posts go at the bottom, IP. To start with, I don't appreciate the racism implication. That is out of line. Anyway, I'm sorry, but your writings are very obviously promotional in nature and are also unsourced. As well, the prose is simply too poor to meet editorial standards. Maybe have a look around first to get a sense of how things work around here...? Wikipedia has a steep learning curve and policy do not bend to one's will simply by virtue of them not knowing of it. El_C 04:06, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Listen, IP, if you're going to be disrespectful, in addition to being unresponsive, then it's definitely not going to work out. El_C 05:23, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.