User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

March 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Halo 4, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 15:12, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2014[edit]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:GoneIn60. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Way out of line. Meters (talk) 22:38, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you Meters for looking out, but I believe this user is just new to Wikipedia and isn't aware of some of the policies and guidelines here. I've posted a reply on my talk page that will hopefully help them out. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
--Well GoneIn60, if you're OK with an editor calling you a "dumb fuck" and other things, you're more tolerant than I am. I think that was a well deserved warning, new editor or not. Meters (talk) 15:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Meters, I didn't see that exact phrase used anywhere, so if it was, then the warning you issued is definitely justified. I am pretty tolerant, but that kind of attack certainly crosses the line. Thanks again. --GoneIn60 (talk) 15:31, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
GoneIn60,it was overwritten on your talk page a few minutes after I issued the warning. Like I said to the IP, way out of line. Meters (talk) 19:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dbrodbeck (talk) 12:14, 13 April 2014 (UTC)