User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

May 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Charles Evans Hughes do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to Charles Evans Hughes was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed ( is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:32, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Coolidge and Stone[edit]

Thanks for adding the law review cites to Calvin Coolidge. Would you mind formatting the links? The {{cite journal}} template would probably work. Thanks! --Coemgenus (talk) 14:53, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, looks great. --Coemgenus (talk) 21:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Chewing the fat?[edit]

Whatever! Can you at least tell me whether Rashid Rauf is definitely dead? Long War Journal says he's alive. --Zhoban (talk) 12:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Infighting in the Gulf Cartel[edit]

Thanks for adding the info on Mario's arrest. Cheers. ComputerJA (talk) 21:02, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Calm As Midnight. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions to NATO bombing of Yugoslavia because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Calm As Midnight 22:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Fair enough.[edit]

But remember that U.S. officials were "95% certain" that Hakimullah Mehsud was killed in January 2010. Hakimullah appeared one year later in the execution video of a man who was kidnapped two months after Hakimullah's supposed death. Anyway, I can see the mainstream media is not taking the newspaper's claims seriously. Why would the Yemeni official lie about the DNA testing though? I'm slow when it comes to this kind of stuff so please explain.--Zhoban (talk) 16:48, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Information.svg It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Long War Journal, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, in order to gain consensus over whether or not to include, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. There has been an RfC that came to a consensus that the material does not belong in the article. To put the material back into the article, you'll need to gain consensus on the talk page. GregJackP Boomer! 16:21, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ANI notice[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents is considered bad practice, even if you meant it well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Haploidavey (talk) 19:30, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
No worries, then, and thanks for your courteous note. Haploidavey (talk) 19:38, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)

Request reason:

did not abuse multiple accounts. I created an account I intended to keep permanently. I did not edit from that account yet and I do not know how to close my previous username. This username is also shared and I don't want other people to get blocked who use it either. The only account I have ever created from this IP was JoetheMoe25 and that new mickey mantle one

Decline reason:

This is sockmaster Mamalujo. The IP was previously blocked as this editor and they returned to the exact same articles such as Cristero War and have been editing consistently under the IP ever since. Extending block to 6 months as the same editor has been at this address for longer.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:31, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

I would like to point out that shared accounts are forbidden also. GregJackP Boomer! 23:51, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

GregJackP sent me a comment and I now feel the user and other potentional Long War Journal fans have screwed me. I recently made a clean edit to the Long War Journal and Bill Roggio pages the user did. I did not violate the synthesis policy , as I pointed out on the Roggio talk pages, and I pointed out that Roggio's controversial claims about terrorist deaths needed to be added. (talk) 23:58, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
I've removed the {unblock} formatting from around this comment. You don't need to use the template to comment, and it isn't useful to have more than one unblock request on the same talk page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:35, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Do not unblock. This is sockmaster Mamalujo. The IP was previously blocked as this editor and they returned to the exact same articles such as Cristero War and have been editing consistently under the IP ever since. If anything, extend the block as they have been at this IP for a year.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:03, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Your accusations are both baseless and ill-founded. I have only edited with the username JoeMoe25 with this IP address and not all the editors on this IP address are me, as you can see from the top template pointing out that multiple individuals can use this IP address. This website also accused me of having a sockpuppet named Shmarak or whatever, who doesn't even share this. I read that Mamalujo block and it was based on the fact that three editors made similar accusations to two different articles I edited. You need to realize people may reinstate content they like after they read it.

I now feel I was blocked by Roggio fans for pointing out the truth about Long War Journal sensation. Hey, that latest "paid-editing" in England scandal could lead to a great deal of revelations about more of these administrative abuses in the next year. (talk) 00:30, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Al-Shihri released an audiotape today confirming he survived the drone strike. Way to go, Dan Rather.

--2001:558:6026:97:9CB6:C28C:B29:830B (talk) 23:27, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

The Audio Tape Could Be A Fabrication[edit]

It has not yet been proven to be his voice at all. Forensics already were reported to have confirmed his death.[1] (talk) 02:52, 22 October 2012 (UTC) Authenticity of tape has not been confirmed yet.{}

HA HA HA, you are hopeless. Reporters say "authenticity not confirmed yet" all the time. Face it, the forensic team was wrong. You were wrong. Shihri is alive. He's the guy speaking in the audiotape. Get over it. Thankfully, you have been blocked for six months so I don't have to worry about you messing with Shihri's page. Enjoy your indenial. --2001:558:6026:97:9CB6:C28C:B29:830B (talk) 13:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Rashid Rauf's famiy have finally confirmed his death.[edit]

Congratulations on proving Bill Roggio wrong.

-- (talk) 13:12, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. If I weren't blocked, I could've typed a response to your talk page.

Actually, your JoeTheMoe account's block expired last month. Anyway, you were also right about Saad Bin Laden. Zawahiri confirmed his death in a video last September. Congratulations for proving Bill Roggio wrong on that too. The only thing that guy was right about was Hakimullah Mehsud. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 23:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

As written on top, it's a shared IP address. It doesn't mean I'm JoetheMoe25. I have different roommates. (talk) 00:43, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

You failed in regards to Shihri dying in September 2012.[edit]

It turns out he survived but was badly wounded in a strike in November or December 2012 and died of his injuries in January 2013. His family confirmed his death. So much for your ad hominem arguments about Yemeni news and about DNA tests confirming he died in September 2012, Mr. Rather. Go figure that AQAP is too embarrassed to admit Shihri is dead.

-- (talk) 17:36, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for citing the article. (talk) 17:43, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

I agree with you about Long War Journal.[edit]

They don't just not know what they are talking about in regards to terrorist leaders being killed. They exaggerate the importance of numerous al-Qaeda members (For example, Hamza Bin Laden is a bit player in his late father's organization and Sulaiman Abu Ghaith and Ustad Ahmad Farooq are just loudmouth spokesmen), lie about senior al-Qaeda members being in Pakistan (Saif al-Adel and Abdullah Ahmed Abdullah are actually in Iran. So was Sulaiman Abu Ghaith before he was arrested.) and continually lie about an Iranian diplomat being a spy when he was kidnapped in 2008. -- (talk) 16:21, 14 March 2013 (UTC)


Regardless, you were still wrong about DNA proving Shihri was dead. This guy is a vampire. I'll believe he's dead when we find his corpse. -- (talk) 12:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)