User talk:76.188.184.251

Please if you want to keep engaging in this edit war on Zuma then ok, go ahead. However, for the sake of correctness stop changing the Ariane 5 AV241 listing as there's no doubt about that: the payload was placed in a wrong orbit (see the authoritative sources that you keep deleting arrogantly) and is therefore considered a partial failure on this list and everywhere else (see previous 'XXXX in spaceflight' lists). --FuocoVivo (talk) 21:59, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The satellites are correcting their orbits and are not lost, but the launcher had an anomaly and placed them in a wrong orbit. The one starting an edit war here is certainly not me. Check the history of the 'xxxx in spaceflight' wikipedia pages and you'll see that cases like this have always been classified as Partial failures. You tell me to 'check the discussion' when other users agree with me and someone else already changed back the flight to 'Partial failure' after you undid it for the second time. So, please, check the discussion here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2018_in_spaceflight#Ariane_5_VA241_Partial_Failure check the other historical precedents and stop changing it back to 'success' and 'operational' in a way that is inconsistent with previous cases.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.