User talk:77siddhartha

Do you really think this is good stuff to link to. Quote,

duh'. science and religion is the same thing. just systems of interpretation supremacy on behalf of a self-declared "enlightened" class which is oh so intelligent and therefore have the "right" to control police and tells us ordinary guys how to behave and act. to tell us what we should long to. i am against all systems of interpretation and control. that is why we cannot allow them to exist at a[b]ll. that is why we in the antifa are beating up fascists. so that people would be afraid to be fascsists so they cannot control us [/b]and force us to grow normal haircuts and get jobs. we want to be free. as long as others just leave us alone, it's ok, but we cannot accept ideologies which put abstract ideals above your and me head, even if they are voluntary. the reason why is that such ideologies WILL eventually grow repressive. therefore, we cannot allow churches, exactly like we cannot allow people to become fascists.

Do you really think this type of thing gives 'weight'. This is a post, and typical of the stuff Net is doing. http://en.technocracynet.eu/index.php?option=com_fireboard&Itemid=63&func=view&id=820&catid=10&limit=15&limitstart=15 Network of European Technocrats - Re:Churches in a technate - N.E.T. Forum (skip sievert 16:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC))

request for comments

I have now put up a request for comments regarding you. See here:

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Skipsievert Isenhand (talk) 17:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)