Jump to content

User talk:78.149.236.151

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reflexivity

[edit]

"A reflexive pronoun is a pronoun that is preceded by the noun or pronoun to which it refers" - te is only a reflexive pronoun if preceded by the pronoun to which it refers - i.e. tu, say in tu te laves where the finite verb is se laver. That it has the same form as the normal direct object pronoun in the sentence je te lave (where the finite verb is laver, not se laver) is coincidental - it's not preceded by the object to which it refers, so it's not reflexive. I'll recorrect the article. Thanks for getting in touch, Knepflerle (talk) 16:17, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

""me", "se", "te", "nous", and "vous" are the french reflexive pronouns" - me is reflexive when used with je, te is reflexive when used with tu, etc. me is not always reflexive - when used with any pronoun other than je it is just a direct object pronoun, as it is not referring to the preceding noun. Read this table here French_personal_pronouns#French_personal_pronouns the te in je te lave is taken from the direct object column because it is a direct object, not a reflexive object.
"a reflexive verb doesnt have to be done to yourself" - just wrong, I'm afraid. That is exactly its definition: from our article here: a reflexive verb is a verb whose ... subject and the direct object ... are the same. Or the OED: reflexive, (5.) Gram. and Linguistics. Of pronouns, verbs, phrases, and their signification: Characterized by, or denoting, a reflex action on the subject of the clause or sentence. I will recorrect the article. Knepflerle (talk) 17:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also notice that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but continue using the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Knepflerle (talk) 17:18, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]