User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search



Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Athena. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address ( is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! --Dstone66 ⑆(talk)⑇(contribs)⑈ 15:38, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Kitten (06) by Ron.jpg

For reverting vandalism on Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks‎

 Iadmctalk  13:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


You do know about WP:3RR right? I've formally warned the other editor, I'm assuming you know about the restriction. Doug Weller talk 11:54, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

I have 3 reverts so far, which is no violatio as far as I know, I won't make any other. (Althoug one might argue that those edits are "obvious vandalism", I won't take the chances.) (talk) 11:57, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I know you only have 3. I'd advise leaving the new edit alone. Looks like someone else from the edit summary, maybe there's a new offwiki request to edit the article. I wouldn't take the chance either. Someone else will come along and revert the new edit, it's not as though no one watches the article. Doug Weller talk 11:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hindu reform movements, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 09:42, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138:: Since when do you require a source when reverting unexplained removal of content? If there had been an edit summery explaining that this content was unsourced, i would not have reverted it. (talk) 09:56, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
this content is unsourced commentary. wp:No original research Jim1138 (talk) 10:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
@Jim1138::Yes. I see that now, too. But it was removed without using an edit summary saying so, so I did not realize that and saw it as unexplained removal of content. (talk) 10:18, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

November 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, IndiGo, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:26, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138: I reverted obvious vandalism, as another user remoded content without explanaiton why and left behind a sentcence fragment. I did not include any new content. (talk) 08:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)