User talk:86.145.240.16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

February 2013[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits, please do not change links simply to avoid a redirect, if the redirect is not broken (such as your edits to Lynne Hobbs and Stacey Slater. Please read WP:NOTBROKEN for more informtation. Thank you. –anemoneprojectors– 09:06, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Kathy Beale, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. –anemoneprojectors– 18:46, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

I've blocked you because you are clearly the same person as was using the IP 86.145.240.199, which is currently blocked. You're welcome to make constructive edits once the block is over, but please stop "avoiding" redirects. Thanks. –anemoneprojectors– 18:51, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of EastEnders characters (1985). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –anemoneprojectors– 09:32, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Beale family. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. –anemoneprojectors– 18:37, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Lucy Beale. Don4of4 [Talk] 20:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges, as done at Naomi Julien. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  –anemoneprojectors– 13:14, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kathy Beale. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –anemoneprojectors– 23:13, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Chrissie Watts. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. –anemoneprojectors– 18:36, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Angie Watts, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. –anemoneprojectors– 16:27, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  5 albert square (talk) 00:16, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Get Johnny Week. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –anemoneprojectors– 18:45, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Liam Butcher. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. –anemoneprojectors– 12:58, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Derek Branning, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I beg of you, PLEASE READ WP:NOTBROKEN and stop changing links to redirects that ARE NOT BROKEN! Thank you! –anemoneprojectors– 17:45, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

  • Not quite serious enough to count as your last disruptive edits but ... please do not add unnecessary links as you did to Margaret Beckett. Tony Blair does not need to be linked from every section. Please read WP:OVERLINK. Thanks. PamD 19:12, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
I think that probably counts as a last disruptive edit. I know the kind of edits this user makes might seem only minor and not that disruptive, but they've continued to make edits despite being asked repeatedly to not ignore guidelines such as WP:OVERLINK and WP:NOTBROKEN, and have been blocked twice already for it. I'll let it pass this time as the recent edits seem to be actually correcting information and spellings, but I'm still keeping an eye on things. –anemoneprojectors– 17:16, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Please stop adding incorrect information to United Kingdom general election, 1950. If you disagree, take it to the talk page - your edit is plainly incorrect. Warofdreams talk 16:32, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges, as done at Shirley Carter. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.