User talk:86.72.215.50

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Your recent edits[edit]

Information.svg Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button Button sig.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:44, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009[edit]

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Editix xml editor, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This article was changed to a redirect by community consensus at an AfD debate. You must not edit against that consensus. Seek a Deletion Review if you are not satisfied with the way the matter was handled. RexxS (talk) 20:51, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Stop hand nuvola.svg This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to List of XML editors. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Laurent (talk) 00:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Editix xml editor[edit]

I can understand your frustration with the Editix xml editor article, as the result of the AfD discussion left it as a redirect to a list that it can't be included in. I'vre raised the issue with the closing admin and he's re-listed it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Editix xml editor (2nd nomination). You now have the opportunity at that discussion to show that the subject is notable. You should be looking for reviews of the software in respected magazines, books or websites. Please click this link: WP:GNG and look at the general notability guidelines to get an idea of what is meant by "Significant coverage", "Reliable" and "Independent of the subject". If you can find significant coverage of the software in more than one independent respected source, quote those sources and you'll stand an excellent chance of keeping the article (which means it could go in the list as well). Many of the sources you brought to Talk:List of XML editors#Suggested addition: EditiX seem to only have mentions of the software being used - you'll need more "significant coverage" than that for AfD. Has Editix xml editor been reviewed at CNET, ZDNET, PCWorld, etc.? Is there an independant book with a chapter on using it? Those are the sorts of coverage you're looking for. I hope this has helped. --RexxS (talk) 02:52, 11 November 2009 (UTC)