User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Regarding your edit to Weehawken, New Jersey:[edit]

Your recent edit to Weehawken, New Jersey (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 05:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for contributions to Hoboken, New Jersey and I would like to encourage you register for the site that in the future your contributions can easily be accredited to you instead of your IP address (gets a little confusing with so many!). Thanks again! --Ozgod 03:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

October 2008[edit]

Information.png Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Toponymy of Bergen, New Netherland has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. MatthewYeager 06:54, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

February 2010[edit]

Information.png Do not remove valid, sourced content from Wikipedia without a valid rationale, as you did with this edit to Union City, New Jersey. The Hudson Reporter and the New York Times are not "unreliable sources". The Times in fact, is one of the most well-known papers in the county. The Hudson Reporter is a legitimate publisher that puts out several local papers, including The Union City Reporter, which interestingly enough, is the the third source that passage, which you left in.

As for whether they mention UC or the Thread, in fact, both of them mention both Union City and the Thread. While it is true that the Times link sometimes leads the web surfer to a sign-up page, there are procedures for dead links, and removing them outright isn't it. In fact, if you enter "Union City, The Thread, embroidery factory" into Google, the first search result is that very Times article, without the sign up page. Even the sign-up page itself says, "An amenity-laden condominium is evidence that developers are still betting on the transformation of Union City." It is the full version of that article that mentions that it is a former embroidery factory. Nightscream (talk) 00:11, 16 February 2010 (UTC)