Jump to content

User talk:91.127.128.189

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Social democracy

[edit]

In regard to this, have you even read Talk:Social democracy? We just had a very long discussion about this and you can't unilateraly get back your favorite edits, especially when you aren't careful enough in checking your version, which includes many of the things that were rejected in the third opinion. But you probably already knew that since it seems to be always you. Just because I said I think, it doesn't mean it's merely just my opinion; your new title sections, which incidentally are the same proposed by Sumes2017, who has been indefinetely blocked for sockpuppetry, are objectively too long and unnecesary; they should be kept short and sweet, which is exactly as it was before and has been for a long time. You need to show why your titles are better or an improvement in relation to the long term ones used. The fact you even accuse me of unilaterally revert[ing] it to your preferred version is laughable as I've been more than forthcoming in incorporating your edits and you're the one who has been edit warring about it, not less without even starting or opening a discussion in the talk page (if you keep getting reverted, maybe that means you should take it to the talk page rather than engage in an edit war). They're encased exactly because in the quote they aren't capitalised but they're nonetheless encased because otherwhise it would be gramatically uncorrect since phrase starts with capitalisation. The thing is they weren't in the original quote, that's why they're added in the first place. See for yourself here, here and here.

But after the development of the class struggle and its reflex in its social conditions had led to the abandonment of these theories and to the elaboration of the principles of scientific socialism, there could be no socialism – at least in Germany – outside of Marxist socialism and there could be no socialist class struggle outside of the Social-Democracy. Form then on, socialism and Marxism, the proletarian struggle for emancipation and the Social-Democracy, were identical. That is why the return to pre-Marxist socialist theories no longer signifies today a return to the seven-league boots of the childhood of the proletariat, but a return to the puny worn-out slippers of the bourgeoisie.

So can you please stop edit warring about it now?--Davide King (talk) 09:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]