User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia. To acquire additional privileges, simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

In addition, your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Happy editing!

Crusio (talk) 18:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

The Master and His Emissary[edit]

Hi, you tagged The Master and His Emissary as an advert without giving any reasons. Looking at WP:NOTSOAPBOX, I don't think that any of the items listed apply, though I'm open to discussion. In the lede, the article does say "a detailed and extensively documented" scientific study — however, I have provided two references to support this claim.

Your input would be appreciated. Thanks, Esowteric+Talk 18:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks: have seen your comment on the article talk page and have tried to add context — starting with a draft "Background context" section before Book summary — and to introduce Jaynes' ideas. Esowteric+Talk 10:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

October 2010[edit]

You may not delete links to Explication de l'Arithmétique Binaire prior to the closing for the RfD you initiated. You also do not appear to have completed the nomination process. Please follow the instruction to complete the nomination. Yworo (talk) 19:11, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Balanced edits[edit]

Please keep up to balanced editing, I see you're interested in wisdom and metahistory, and SU and other intriguing topics but economics and finances are not quitе like that. --Aleksd (talk) 14:01, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 2678455 |doi=10.2307/2678455}}</ref> has not been met with approval<ref>Timothy Bays' disagreement({{cite journal |first1=Timothy |last1=Bays |month=April |year=2004 |title=On Floyd and Putnam on

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:34, 17 January 2014 (UTC)


Why unconvincing? Here is for example what the stars said about daughter of Galileo (Livia), according to her father. Galileo begins as follows: "Livia's temperament: Mercury and the Moon in separated signs...: the very well placed Mercury in Virgo overcomes the weak Moon so that the emotional side is completely subjected to the rational." (J. L. Heilbron, Galileo, Oxford, 2010, p. 92) Sepiolo (talk) 19:17, 19 January 2014 (UTC)