User talk:

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

In addition, your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Paris1127 (talk) 23:13, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Old St. Peter's Basilica, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 21:19, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This applies equally to the many other talkpages on which you've been posting your personal views. Acroterion (talk) 21:21, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

My dear Acroterion or Paris?, thanks for the welcome! Oh, I only "edit" my posts/responses and not those of others. Perhaps I will take you up concerning your gracious invitation. But I am bothered by this sentence from you; "Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Old St. Peter's Basilica, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 21:19, 5 October 2013 (UTC)" If indeed the words "talk page" is descriptive enough, then perhaps it should be changed? I only talk about the possibility that there existed more than two versions of St. Peter's Basilica, which is what this site declares. I offered a verifiable and valid site to defend my allegation, and, I think, I also offered enough sites to make one wake up and pay attention, and consider my allegations, which John could not do. But, since I am not at all able to understand inter-net language and thought, I doubt that giving me the "computer ability" to do certain things would translate in my ability to conform and follow the instructions. And when are "personal views" not appropriate for "talk pages"? I seem to see literally dozens of pages concerning Moslem situations be crammed full of "personal views" with little done to the perpetrators! I just barely understand the usage of four tildes when entering one of my posts! LOL I merely question the idea that only two structures have occupied the former Vatican Hill for the last 1,200 years or so, and I feel the same way about the Hagia Sophia, and please note I have been into and around both in my lifetime. Regards, (talk) 00:17, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Ronald L. Hughes

Please remember that Wikipedia is based on reliable secondary sources, preferably peer-reviewed academic research, and not on the personal theories of individual Wikipedians. If published, reviewed research exists to back up your assertions, please provide those sources. Otherwise, you're improperly using the talkpage to advance a personal theory. Such material must be explicitly stated in the source, and not derived from your personal assessment of an image. Please read Wikipedia's policies on reliable sources, synthesis and no original research, and please do not badger people who respond to you on the talkpages of individual articles when they point these policies out to you. Acroterion (talk) 00:57, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File talk:Périgueux 3.JPG[edit]

A tag has been placed on File talk:Périgueux 3.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Flying Saucer (talk) 00:01, 11 October 2013 (UTC)