User talk:98.223.133.1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to Wikipedia[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (98.223.133.1) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! ke4roh (talk) 00:39, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Pope John Paul II, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cresix (talk) 01:03, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kidnapping of Jaycee Lee Dugard, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sorry, this is too close in content to [1] not to be regarded as plagiarism, but feel free to summarize, using that site as a source. Hengist Pod (talk) 00:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Pinckneyville, Illinois with this edit do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Noformation Talk 01:09, 12 June 2011 (UTC) Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:22, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

August 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Magliano de' Marsi has been reverted.
Your edit here to Magliano de' Marsi was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://cnsblog.wordpress.com/2011/08/12/pope-heads-to-the-hills-to-pray/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:46, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 18:57, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.


Please see - Talk:Intimate_relationship[edit]

A redraft of the paragraph you added has been started on: Talk:Intimate_relationship. Please feel free to comment there. Hope this helps Mediation4u (talk) 07:52, 26 August 2011 (UTC) editing is fun

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:13, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Duane Buck[edit]

Thanks for the big addition! jorgenev 03:24, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

mu Opioid receptor[edit]

I have reverted your addition of a copy and pasted press release into an article for a number of reasons. First of all, this may represent a copy right violation. Second, the length of the added material is way out of proportion to the the importance of this particular finding to the over all subject of the mu Opioid receptor. Finally Wikipedia articles should simply state facts and not hype who or where the study was conducted. Press releases are by definition primarily hype. Boghog (talk) 04:55, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

I included those details for valid reasons. The study was funded and conducted by those institutions. You are allowed to cite tracts of a study with potential medical relevance only if you acknowledge the organizations and individuals who carried it out, that cannot be considered the same as advertising a corporation or institution. It was necessary to include the depth of information that I did because it is part of the scientific explanation behind the research, and one would have to know which parts of the study are unimportant and which are not before they decide what to leave and what must be mentioned. The fact that I cited the writer, the date it was posted, the principal investigator and his title, and the date the study was carried out and the institutions involved, plus a web link, should be more than sufficient to shield me from those concerns- I included quotations around every portion of it and mentioned it was a press release, clearly it was not stated as my own work.
Potential copyright infringement was the least of my concerns. Material added to this article should focus on what the study says about the mu opioid receptor, not what the mu opioid receptor says about Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. I don't have access to the full paper, but based on the papers abstract, I have added a short section on morphine-induced scratching to the article that summarizes the conclusions of the study. Boghog (talk) 06:36, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm sorry, I just wasn't sure what to include and what not to.

October 2011[edit]

Your addition to Elizabeth Johnson (theologian) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Imzadi 1979  02:33, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page List of archives do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.  
Your edit here to List of archives was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.science.org.au/basser/)) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:23, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Reduction (orthopedic surgery), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Mayur (talkEmail) 06:02, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (98.223.133.1) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! User:Goldblooded (Talk/Discuss)(Complain) 15:21, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Middleton[edit]

Hi - unuaslly such minor relationships and tabliod additions like your last edit are not considered to be encyclopedic notworthy additions - this is not a celebrity magazine - please open a discussion on the talkpage Talk:Pippa Middleton if your desire to add such content thanks - Off2riorob (talk) 15:24, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


John Francis Donoghue[edit]

HI. I tweaked the text for Archbishop Donoghue in accordance with WP:BLP and WP:MOS. Excessive title styling rv as this is not an ecclesial publication. Also, promotional text rv as this is not an obituary site. Yours. Quis separabit? 20:02, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Content from Huffington[edit]

Hi, thank you for your edits to update Wikipedia articles based on news articles (i.e. Schriever Air Force Base or Kaliningrad Oblast). It is important to keep the articles updated. However, please keep in mind that Wikipedia is not a news service. The stories, unless extremely notable, should be shortened to one or two sentences. That would not only avoid copyright infringement (copying even small amounts of text is a big no-no in Wikipedia), but also make sure that Wikipedia articles remain encyclopedic and not overrun with tedious day-to-day news reports. Think about it this way: say, the article on Schriever Air Force Base should cover 20+ years of its operations, so adding 250 words on an unremarkable incident is undue weight to recent events. Those one or two sentences should be referenced, giving the reading the ability to follow the links and find more information about the incident, if they so desire. Let me know if you have any questions. Happy editing! Renata (talk) 15:24, 23 November 2011 (UTC)