User talk:Aboddie6

Welcome!

Hello, Aboddie6, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Concerning Vida Guerra

Go check this reference to see why you're wrong. After seeing this, all other reverts can be seen as vandalism. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 01:59, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 00:49, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because I actually follow rules. How is that you make a change to something that has a reference right by it that says otherwise? In my eyes, that's totally irrational, and you have no reason to tell anyone that they need to leave this site, based solely on that. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 00:59, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, and I think you just violated the 3RR. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 01:00, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It amazes me how you still haven't checked this reference. And what rules out the possibility that she, or whoever else said that, is lying??? People can lie, especially on the Internet. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 05:02, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with what you said, but something sticks out in your message: define these "personal attacks" you claim I've made. I'd advise not going on the word of some of those users who've posted messages claiming I've attacked them; 99.9 percent of them have been blocked before, repeatedly, I might add. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 07:04, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]