User talk:Abstergo681

hello

Speedy deletion nomination of Oxford Public School

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Oxford Public School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — fortunavelut luna 17:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, text such as exalts the glory of God by fulfilling the MISSION OF CHRIST, ...founded on a solid base of ideals, goals and objectives., equipped with world class facilities, the school has positioned itself as a modern day GURUKUL, and A veritable source of knowledge, the school has left no stone unturned is considers highly promotional on Wikipedia. The entire tone of the page was more suited to a marketing brochure than to a Wikipedia article. Wikipedia articles should not express any value judgements or opinions beyond the verifiable facts, except for opinions in cited quotations attributed to named persons. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 18:47, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]