User talk:AdamSurch

Welcome!

Hello, AdamSurch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Iván Sánchez ^(talk) 09:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commercial material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. -- Iván Sánchez ^(talk) 09:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spam in Exchange@PAM

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Exchange@PAM, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Exchange@PAM is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Exchange@PAM, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 09:31, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedic content

Hi there,

Please have a look at WP:NOT for things that are not encyclopedic content, and WP:N for the things that are notable enough to deserve an encyclopedia article. -- Iván Sánchez ^(talk) 09:44, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

How does 'Enterprise Vault' qualify for a wiki entry?

Because it got a review from a third party, eWeek. It's all in WP:N and WP:V. -- Iván Sánchez ^(talk) 09:50, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

How about now with the msexchange.org award under 'industry sources', does this count as a verifiable third party source?

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 15:00, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Exchange@PAM Entry

The general rule is found at WP:N, not all competitive programs get an article - only those which have received significant third party coverage from reliable sources. Has PC Week or one of the other magazines devoted to computers done a featured article on the product? Unfortunately, merely winning an award is not sufficient to establish notability unless it is the most recognized award in the (broadly-defined) field- so some product of the year award by a large recognized award bestower. If you still the software is notable under the guidelines, you should re-create the article in your user space here until it's fully ready for prime-time. You should also read WP:COI because this is your software that you are writing about. While writing about your own product is not prohibited, it does generate some negative feelings and those articles may be held to a higher standard of objectivity: the material needs to be neutral in tone WP:NPOV; the bad points or shortcomings need to be mentioned along with the good ones - what features the competitors have that your product doesn't, including being backed up by a large multinational company for service and support need to be mentioned or it'll read more like an ad. Ads written by people with a conflict of interest are generally frowned upon and often get deleted. Cheers, Carlossuarez46 17:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Exchange@PAM Logo.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Exchange@PAM Logo.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:16, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]