User talk:AenglscriptEnlight/List of Issues and Privacy Concerns about Matters Related to Prophets

Contested deletion (Reference Issues About Privacy Concerns Pertinent Prophets)

This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject, because... {ÆnglscriptEnlight (talk) 19:03, 22 August 2017 (UTC)} There was an article I was reading last night, on Prophet Idris (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idris_(prophet)), which had content that was blaringly in conflict with other Wikipedia articles, and I put comments in the Talk page.

Instead of speedily deleting, may I suggest moving the content to a talk page, which it seems you have done, perhaps about the Prophets, or to a different section.

-It was slow in editing the articles about Prophets for consistency, including of facts; the nomination for speedily delete, for information intended to help Wikipedia authors all get on the same page, seems a conflict of interest in itself, the idea is to help everyone at this.

Some of the traditions of Muhammad, (prayers, peace), I personally have not read in over a decade, but clearly remember them, and might have to take a day or so to pull up the original book source, hard to find online, that it came from. This refers to the saying of Muhammad on texts of the Injeel being edited in later years.

In the Islam, it is promoted not to allow 'ransacking' and carte blanche reckless or loose 'throwing around' of knowledge and sayings that refer or are in connection to Prophets, as it is seemed disrespectful. Therefore, a list such as this, is substantiated and justified. Let it at least be around long enough for other scholars to look at and make suggestions, revisions, or add to the content.