User talk:Aerlenbu

July 2017[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Jim Garlow ‎, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. O1lI0 (talk) 16:45, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The content was inaccurate and wrong and extremely misguided. You have already been reported to wiki for your the any content you contributed.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Jim Garlow. O1lI0 (talk) 17:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:33, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Aerlenbu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18735 was submitted on Jul 14, 2017 02:34:10. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:34, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RickinBaltimore the articles that are on Jim Garlow's wikipedia page are false and are deep into defamation waters.