User talk:Afackrell/sandbox3
Paig5 (Paig5) 11:12, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Points: 38/40
- Grade: 95%
Spelling/Grammar
[edit]Meets Expectations This meets the expectations, I just have a few suggestions on some minor grammatical changes or sentence structure changes:
1. ...the former at 7.1% and Finland at 7.4%
2. Nokia, the telephone company, and...
Language
[edit]Meets Expectations Your language seems very professional.
Organization
[edit]Meets Standard Your paragraphs are plenty long enough and look great.
Coding
[edit]Meets Standard I don't see anything wrong with any of your coding.
Validity
[edit]Meets Standard All of your statements of facts are cited.
Completion
[edit]Meets Standard Everything is long enough and you have the right amount of sources.
Relevance
[edit]Meets Standard All information included pertains to the subject matter.
Sources
[edit]Meets Standard All of your sources are appropriate for what was written. They all seem like high quality sources.
Citations
[edit]Meets Standard
References
[edit]Meets standard.
6/11/2019 Evaluation by Gabbym9903
[edit]Gabbym9903 (Gabbym9903) 14:24, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
- Points: 39/40
- Grade: 97.5%
Spelling/Grammar
[edit]Nearly meets standard The spelling and grammar of the edit look good overall with a few mistakes:
1. "industries in Finland as a whole are;" ; should be :
2. "employing about 79% of the cities workforce" cities should be city's
3. "produced by Nokia and 21% of the countries total exports' countries should be country's
4. "The company with distribute 30 million euro" I think with should be will
Language
[edit]Meets Standard. The edit is well-written with academic language.
Organization
[edit]Meets Standard The formatting looks good and paragraphs are not too long or too short.
Coding
[edit]Meets Standard The coding is correct, i didn't find any mistakes.
Validity
[edit]Meets Standard There are no signs of plagiarism and the sources used are reliable.
Completion
[edit]Meets Standard The edit meets the 5 paragraphs and 20 sources requirements.
Relevance
[edit]Meets Standard The flow of information is good and everything is related to the economy of Helsinki.
Sources
[edit]Meets Standard The sources correspond to the topic and to Wikipedia's policies. I was only confused by source #9 because when I click the link, it takes me to a page with many files and I don't know which file you got the information from.
Citations
[edit]Meets Standard All citations look correct, except the only mistake I found is that there shouldn't be a space after the last sentence of the first paragraph, where citation #4 is.
References
[edit]Meets standard. All references seem well-written and formatted.
6/17/2019 Evaluation by DrMichaelWright
[edit]DrMichaelWright (talk) 10:31, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
I had been hoping for better.
- Points: 31/40
- Grade: 77.5%
Spelling/Grammar
[edit]Meets standard.
Language
[edit]Meets standard.
Organization
[edit]Does not meet standard.
- There are no subheaders that make this easier to read, and to provide a skeleton for other editors to add flesh to.
- The paragraph about the airport properly belongs under the Transportation>Aviation header.
- Most of your last paragraph also belongs under transportation.
Coding
[edit]Meets standard.
Validity
[edit]Nearly meets standard.
- Your first sentence is from the original (which is not bad), but you eliminated the word 'Greater' and changed the reference. By omitting Greater, you essentially change the meaning where there was no need to do so.
- "The gross value added annual growth has been around 4%.[2]" That datapoint is not backed up by the source offered, which replaces the source that is in the current Helsinki article.
Completion
[edit]Meets standard.
Relevance
[edit]Nearly meets standard.
- "Finland joined the EU in 1995 and the European Economic and Monetary Union in 1999." This is not really relevant for this article.
- "A study done in April 2019 comparing..." is about Finland as a whole, not Helsinki.
Sources
[edit]Does not meet standard.
- There are few-if-any peer-reviewed scholarly sources.
- A number of sources are so dated they come from the web archive. The Wayback machine is fine for re-sourcing previously-written material, but not newly-written material about an up-to-date topic.
Citations
[edit]Nearly meets standard.
- A couple of space issues.
- "...traffic as well as promote the EU's climate policy objectives." is copy/pasted from original without paraphrasing or quotation marks.
References
[edit]Does not meet standard.
- The references are not properly formatted.