User talk:Agctrain
Agctrain, March 2008
[edit]I find this “warning” from the user, “Nobody of Consequence" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nobody_of_Consequence heavy handed, without merit, and enigmatic. The quote referenced by "Nobody" is misleading. The entry that is proposed can now be found here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Todd_Stroger.
Why "Nobody" has a problem with these facts and continues to delete them (given the above entries in the Todd Stroger section) has not been explained him or her. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Todd_Stroger&diff=next&oldid=195203412
Instead, this individual has simply deleted without engaging in discussion or proposing alternate text. In my opinion this is not community-standards-based but instead more indicative of a coterie mindset.
I welcome other input from un-biased individuals.
March 2008
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Todd Stroger, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 21:06, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- This edit [1] is blatant POV, and violates WP:NPOV. Wikipedia is not your personal political platform for voicing your opinions on whether Stroger is "putting people on the payroll" or not. If you'd like to voice your POV, get a blog. I will continue to revert POV edits and unsourced commentaries. Further e-mails from you will not be read and will be deleted on sight. Nobody of Consequence (talk) 01:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)