User talk:Agitatov

February 2011

Warning!

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Athens. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 23:32, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Athens. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 23:33, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Athens, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dr.K. ^{λogosπraxis} 23:37, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Athens

I've protected Athens, please stop edit warring and removing sourced content from the article and instead work it out on the article's talk page. If you continue edit warring once protection has expired, you will be blocked for disruption. Dreadstar ☥ 17:08, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Dreadstar: I for sure do not intend edit warring or vandalizing, but I thought that Wikipedia was open to everybody to make corrections on wrong or incomplete information and that the aim was to provide as high information quality as possible. Obviously this is not the case, as all my interventions to show the whole truth and to explain that the value is contested (and it is indeed - I cited several sources) were rejected. I do not understand, how you can tolerate such a disinformation and how a remark about the at least questionable unique character of the 48,0°C in Athens can be such a problem. Why does this guy, whose positions are always being contested and who has already been banned from climate forums, get such a protection ? , rgds Agitatov (talk) 23:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can discuss content with the other editors on the article's talk page, administrators tend to focus on behavior like edit warring - unless the content seriously violates one of WP's core policies like Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. I'm here to end the disruption, not to mediate or settle the dispute. You can seek assistance through the Dispute Resolution process if you like. Dreadstar ☥ 00:13, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]