User talk:Ahige/sandbox

Potential Articles to Edit:

Genetic Testing: I believe there can be an article added on the history of genetic testing. Also, I think more can be added in regards to the ethics of genetic testing with view points from both sides of the argument. Another point I would look at would be all the diseases listed in that article that can be tested for.

Beneficence (ethics): I can add additional material from The Belmont Report and how beneficence is one of the main ethical principles. Also, the connection to nonmaleficence would be important to note in this article. It didn't look like there was anything under the talk page on the topic.

Predictive Testing: There is a good definition for this idea under the article, but I would include more about the ethical side of it and opinions from both sides of the argument. Also, possibly adding more examples would be better to understand the topic for readers.

Genetic Testing Ethics

Genetic Discrimination

A possible consequence of undergoing genetic testing includes discrimination from medical insurance companies or employers. Due to the nature of individuals having no control over their genetic makeup, it is unethical and unfair for them to be discriminated against due to a certain condition. Ethical debate began over the possibility of insurance companies raising premiums, decreasing benefits, or refusing coverage for individuals who undergo predictive genetic testing (reference). While the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 did not protect patient's from genetic discrimination, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) was passed in 2009 to protect patient's from discrimination. Under GINA it is illegal to discriminate individuals who undergo genetic testing in the area of medical insurance and when employers hire individuals with genetic conditions. There are instances when GINA does not apply, including in businesses with less than 15 people and other forms of insurance besides medical (reference). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahige (talk • contribs) 17:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Individual Privacy and Confidentiality

Ethical controversy and considerations exist over the issue of individuals sharing genetic testing results. Oftentimes, if an individual has the chance to acquire a genetic condition, there are also risks for their family members. One position on this ethical dilemma believes the individual should share their health information if it has the chance to impact their family members, including parents, children, siblings, and extended family members (reference). On the other hand, the argument is for individual privacy and confidentiality, with the patient being the ultimate decider on whether to disclose genetic information or not. With individuals who prefer not to share their genetic testing results, there is a chance for psychological harm and attempts at persuasion from healthcare providers. With implementing the ethical principles of respect for persons and beneficence, the patient can make informed decisions without undue harm or persuasion from physicians. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahige (talk • contribs) 22:35, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reflection

Critiquing articles: During the article evaluation on Wikipedia, I learned How did you approach critiquing the article you selected for this assignment? How did you decide what to add to your chosen article?

Summarizing your contributions: include a summary of your edits and why you felt they were a valuable addition to the article. How does your article compare to earlier versions?

Peer Review: If your class did peer review, include information about the peer review process. What did you contribute in your review of your peers article? What did your peers recommend you change on your article?

Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback?

Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important?