User talk:Alan1000
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Alan1000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Srleffler (talk) 01:17, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
May 2011
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Random-access memory, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 16:35, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
Please, discuss your suggestions about subsets on the talk page first. It makes an impression of WP:original research and, in any way, was not sourced, so I removed it completely from the article. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
March 2016
[edit]
Hello, I'm David.moreno72. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Religion in Jersey— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. David.moreno72 (talk) 15:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
- Re: a long term tendency to add unsourced content to multiple articles, based on your personal observations--please don't. Wikipedia's guidelines are really clear on this--unsourced and original research content aren't acceptable. To respect that is not, as you've characterized it, a function of authoritative reach, but one of the basic tenets of a reputable encyclopedia. I've removed your most recent edits, and encourage you to contribute, supporting your additions with the inclusion of WP:RELIABLE sources. Thanks, 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:31, 18 March 2016 (UTC)