User talk:Alissarobles
The facts presented on this page of Polygamy do have some reliable references, but mostly are books and not peer reviewed articles.Further, I noticed that some even used wiki sources and other common sites most likely found on Google. Everything on the article did not appear to be relevant due to the dramatic shifts of regions, religion, and topics overall. The organization was quite confusing as well sloppy in a sense because some subheadings were just one sentence long.The page appears to be neutral because it does mention all sides and even specifies the stance in particular locations. The viewpoints varied,but some headings were extremely thorough while some appeared to be vague and underrepresented. The page has a vast amount of references; however, only a few have actual available links and web pages.
Start a discussion with Alissarobles
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Alissarobles. What you say here will be public for others to see.
