User talk:Als8888

November 2022

Hello, I'm JeffUK. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Jim Fouratt, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please review Wikipedia:USERG for why the 'previous editor' described the sources as unreliable. and WP:BLP to understand why the information is being removed immediately. JeffUK (talk) 10:25, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An interview with jim fouratt is not an unreliable source for a jim fouratt wiki. Peetending it is is dishonest. Als8888 (talk) 15:17, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention a literal video of the event being described happening. Just because you dont like what happened doesnt mean it didnt happen. Als8888 (talk) 15:18, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did go back and make the language more neutral so it is more fact-based. Als8888 (talk) 16:06, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And sorry i got snappy. There have been a number of people taking it down bc it doesnt look good politically for them i guess so i assumed you were doing the same. I have since seen that that was not the case. Als8888 (talk) 23:10, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 76.135.154.252 (talk) 07:15, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was engaged in an adit war because that person kept just removing my edits, despite adding more and more additional citations to back it up because for no reason. Als8888 (talk) 08:14, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think i showed my good faith and willingness to collaborate with @jeffuk earlier. I even voluntarily went back and made additional edits based on the feedback he gave. Thats not what these people were doing. They were trying to erase the event (that AGAIN is caught on video and cited) from history. Als8888 (talk) 08:15, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 07:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 07:23, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. firefly ( t · c ) 08:46, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have extended this to an indefinite block, as you are clearly not here to build an encyclopedia and instead to push your viewpoint. RickinBaltimore (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]