User talk:Amorpropio28

July 2020

Hello, I'm Binksternet. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Slavery on the Barbary Coast, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 05:19, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Slavery in the Ottoman Empire; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 20:15, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hello, why did you delete the photo if I already provided the link to the information on it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amorpropio28 (talk • contribs)

I deleted the photo because you were adding it everywhere, twice in some places, and breaking the page layout code. Binksternet (talk) 20:29, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for my mistake, I am going to look for the sources of the other pages to add them.

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Slavery on the Barbary Coast, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 22:58, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Barbary slave trade shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. M.Bitton (talk) 14:36, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Refusal to communicate

Why are you edit warring and ignoring the request to take it to the talk page and explain what a "Meccan merchant" has to do with the Barbary coast? M.Bitton (talk) 20:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]