User talk:AndreáaC7

September 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages (including user talk pages) such as Talk:United States are for discussion related to improving (a) an encyclopedia article in specific ways based on reliable sources or (b) project policies and guidelines. They are not for general discussion about the article topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 03:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:United States that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 03:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"I wonder about the day you discover that Mexico is an "American" State as part of the OAS." -> Wikipedia:Comment on content, not on the contributor. As a matter of fact, you keep continue giving me vibes that you are Martiello:

You keep using talk pages to criticize the topic and not to discuss the article (not even the redirect).
You keep talking about the editors and not about the article.
You both use dictionaries to support irrelevances.
you both criticize Wikipedia, yet continue using it.
You somehow found this thread, decided to comment, not only in favor of Martiello (without seeing their entire list of problematic edits), but in the same manner ("Imagine being more reasonable, logical and having more common sense" vs. "I've told the truth on this talk page. Which is something others are certainly intimidated by.")

According to you, you find video games appealing, but none of your contributions are related to video games; you are interested in bias, but you are not editing about bias. If you are telling the truth about being a member of the Bulbapedia or Mario fandom, or else, you would know that those websites, like Wikipedia, forbid users from using their talk pages for chatting about the topic [1][2]

Also, this is a violation of WP:POLEMIC. If you persist adding it, you will most likely be blocked. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 03:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tbhotch

"You keep talking about the editors and not about the article." Who else writes the articles?
"You keep using talk pages to criticize the topic and not to discuss the article (not even the redirect). I am not even going to try.
"you both criticize Wikipedia, yet continue using it." What do I critize of Wikipedia? Exactly English Wikipedia. Just see the gamergate article in both English and Spanish, it is biased, and better to not even start in the contradictions of the Caribbean article in English Wikipedia.
"You both use dictionaries to support irrelevances." You made a false claim regarding the use of Spanish and you used it as if it was a supporting fact when is not. Why can't I also report you for replying irrelevancies when used those three links that in fact are irrelevant?
"You somehow found this thread, decided to comment..." "Somehow you say" I am following this thread since ever, specially thanks to that YT video of: "Is America a continent or country". Sorry, he was being more reasonable than everyobdy else in that thread. I never said he was holding the ultimate truth (neither you and the other guys).

Here is an example of why most of the time I don't comment: https://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Talk:Leaf_(game). That is why most of the time I just add images, models, data. Btw, can you tell me how to report you for slandering me by accusing me for being another user, please? AndreáaC7 (talk) 04:34, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:No legal threats#Defamation. Even though I didn't say you were another person, I merely said you give me the impression of being another person. [3] Interesting motto, you know who else likes to write in Spanish? The Italian guy. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 17:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Omg (facepalm), it is like Wikipedia is doing everyhting againts me. So because you slander me I can't act on it because it is a "legal threat" and off course I will get blocked. Then what should I do if talking with you is unresonable. And you still keep slandering me. But I can't do nothing, right? AndreáaC7 (talk) 17:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you need to read slander and understand its legal connotations. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 17:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We are talking about a general definition of slandering not a legal one. That is why if you search on google the defintion of slander the legal one has a box that says "LAW". And that is what the wikipedia article is based on. AndreáaC7 (talk) 17:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then WP:ANI. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 17:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nvm, it is useless. You can get away with your behaviour. This is disgusting and it is already becoming sickening. AndreáaC7 (talk) 17:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]