User talk:Angelaquency

Angelaquency (talk) 17:42, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jaume Cañellas Galindo[edit]

I'm fairly certain that scanning documents of unverifiable sourcing and then uploading them to Imageshack does not satisfy the burden of meeting WP:RS. Please do not remove {{fv}} tags without actual sources. --Kinu ^t/_c 01:45, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sockpuppetry (see User:Jorgelopest). If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu ^t/_c 02:19, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Angelaquency (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no "multiple accounts" (WP: Sock Duck User: Jorgelopest: I do not know this "user": User: Jorgelopest). I would like to be unlocked in order to contribute properly. Thank you.

Decline reason:

I've taken a look, and it's incredibly obvious that you're Jorgelopest. Don't play this game with us. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.