User talk:Anglicanhistory562
November 2022
[edit]
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Steve Breedlove. Thank you. UtoD 07:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- These are properly referenced. They are official legal documents from the Diocese of Christ Our Hope, where Breedlove is bishop. Anglicanhistory562 (talk) 07:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- WP:SYNTH issue in using and interpreting youtube videos when involving WP:BLP. Further WP:UNDUE weight issues especially as you are adding a large WP:CSECTION. -UtoD 07:59, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- The quotes are direct quotes from the YouTube video. There is no interpretation involved in this instance. Anglicanhistory562 (talk) 08:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- WP:RSPYT considers it generally unreliable and not credible for WP:BLP. There is interpretation on what the person didn't say. -UtoD 08:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, what a person did not say is not interpretation. They either did or did not say something. In this case, it is a simple fact that Breedlove did not name this person in his official, planned apology. This is germane to the matter at hand. Anglicanhistory562 (talk) 08:08, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Regardless of whether the Youtube link qualifies as WP:RS (it generally doesn't), this controversy is not properly contextualized on the page. There is no explanation for why this section should occupy half of the subject's article and should be reverted until properly contextualized per WP:UNDUE. Dclemens1971 (talk) 23:05, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- Actually, what a person did not say is not interpretation. They either did or did not say something. In this case, it is a simple fact that Breedlove did not name this person in his official, planned apology. This is germane to the matter at hand. Anglicanhistory562 (talk) 08:08, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- WP:RSPYT considers it generally unreliable and not credible for WP:BLP. There is interpretation on what the person didn't say. -UtoD 08:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- The quotes are direct quotes from the YouTube video. There is no interpretation involved in this instance. Anglicanhistory562 (talk) 08:01, 10 November 2022 (UTC)