User talk:Anon126/Archive 13

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

→

Archive 20

E-mail!

Hello, Anon126. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 19:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Anon126-- Did you get a chance to read this over yet? I think you'd be a good fit for our project. Thanks, I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 18:08, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Archived talk page

Hi, where are your recent talk pages messages in the past? It was archived by you! --Allen ^{(talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me)} 01:33, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

To editor Allen2: Hi, yes, they have. You can access and search the archives by clicking "[show]" in the "Archives" box. Did you want to talk about something that was archived? Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 06:00, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

It was here. --Allen ^{(talk to me! / ctrb / E-mail me)} 06:04, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Lunar Eclipse

Hi! As part of a class assignment Victoria (talk), Andrew (talk), Kieran (talk), and I (Jordan (talk)) will be working on expanding the article about lunar eclipses (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Lunar_eclipse). We noticed that you have been writing on the talk page on the article, and we were hoping you might be able to help us out with getting started. For each of us, this is our first time seriously editing Wikipedia, but we wanted to add citations in the Lunar Eclipse in Mythology, Blood Moon, and Occurrence sections. We also wanted to add material to the Lunar Eclipse in Mythology section, Lunar versus Solar Eclipse section, and the Multimedia section.

In case you were wondering, the talk page for our class website is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_Program:Cornell_University/Online_Communities_(Fall_2014)

Thank you,

Jordan (talk) 04:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Amy Devers

I deleted the picture because the edit was made by a sockpuppet of User:Newzealand123, in evasion of a block, per WP:EVASION. Have a look here, it's a pretty major socking operation [1]. Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Special relativity

Hi I would like your oppinon reqarding special relativity, bentsutomu1234

Hi, Bentsutomu1234, are you talking about what you've written at User:Bentsutomu1234/sandbox? I'm sorry to say that I'm not very knowledgeable in that area, so I cannot offer any opinions on it. However, I will say that you should not be keeping it there unless you intend to add it to Wikipedia's article about special relativity. Wikipedia is not a personal Web host; these personal sandboxes should only be for potential article content. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 05:03, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright Permission for Obsessive Love Wheel

The author of Confusing Love with Obsession will give permission to use the Obsessive Love Wheel for the Obsessive Love Page. Dr. John Moore can be reached at johndmoore1@aol.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CE09:AA10:61F4:3839:8ED8:948 (talk) 14:54, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saint John School Of Quezon City concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saint John School Of Quezon City, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Example of how to define a URI for an XHTML/XML Document

Moved from User talk:126Bot

Thanks for your answer.So do we only need to define an DTD or schema or is there any other things which are essential.I want to really know if there is any format or a structure to represent xmlns URI.Also whether the URI is parsed by an common XML parser or whether we have to define an XML parser.Because if we have created an XML file and specified a DTD in the URI do they(XML parser) really check the URI?I think if it's just for namespace conflict,we don't have to create a seperate link for that but instead just give any name to avoid the conflict.Also is it mandatory to include the DTD or schema in URI or can we specify it in any other way?JUSTIN JOHNS (talk) 09:50, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

A DTD/schema should be enough. The URI in xmlns really is arbitrary; there's no format you need to follow. You could just make a random name to avoid conflicts; it doesn't have to point to a DTD or schema. The place to specifiy a DTD is in the DOCTYPE, and the place to specify a schema is in schemaLocation. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 08:34, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your anwser,now I got what an URI really means.But should the link given in URI be a valid one.Like if you name a site that doesn't exist is there any problem?Also you mentioned that we could give a random name to avoid conflicts,does that mean we could give any name.JUSTIN JOHNS (talk) 07:08, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

To editor JUSTIN JOHNS: It doesn't have to be valid, and you could, in theory, give any name. The problem might be if you give a website that doesn't exist and then someone else starts using it in the future. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 18:15, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Okay.So does that mean that a valid url should be given in the hope that no one uses it in the future.By saying "no one uses in the future" does that mean 'use it as an namespace' or 'use it as an web address' or whether it indicates both?JUSTIN JOHNS (talk) 06:51, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Justin. I've moved your message up here. Please click the [edit] link next to the section heading to keep messages about the same topic grouped together.

To answer your question, yes, that is what I mean. Bt "no one uses in the future," I mean both. Anon126 (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 02:11, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews

Hello Anon126. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Props for stepping in on Coconot's talkpage!

And, um, good luck. Something tells me that she's not going to budge for anyone (her blog, therealcolorado.blogspot.com, is a fascinating read, but then again I enjoy fringe and conspiracy theories in a 'wow, people actually believe this stuff?' kind of way). But thank you so much for being reasonable, and I really hope she listens to you! NekoKatsun (talk) 01:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saint John School Of Quezon City

Hello Anon126. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Saint John School Of Quezon City".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Saint John School Of Quezon City}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Your request at Files for upload

Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! Unfortunately, your request has been declined. The reason is shown on the main FFU page. The request will be archived shortly; if you cannot find it on that page, it will probably be at this month's archive. Regards, (t) Josve05a (c) 06:24, 5 December 2014 (UTC)