User talk:Applejuicelover444/Digital poetry

peer review[edit]

Hi! I am leaving a message for you in terms of your draft for your work on Digital poetry! I think your section on hypertext poetry is well done, you did a good job explaining a more difficult concept and cited a lot of sources. I would switch the first two sentences, I think the summary before the explanation would be helpful. Then it flows into the section saying 'more specifically'! I like how you have a few different ways of wording it too. Applejuicelover444 (talk) 14:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

peer review 2[edit]

I just wanted to mention again how great a job you did with citing sources for each sentence (and reliable ones at that!). I don't remember if you said if the last paragraph was also written by you, but if it was I like the way that it was explained. It made understanding the concept easier. Paired with the section I know you wrote, it all flowers together nicely. It's non-biased and a good explanation which is really the intention of Wikipedia. Applejuicelover444 (talk) 14:04, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]