User talk:AryeitskiySaldat

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, AryeitskiySaldat, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! --GreenJoe 04:43, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The BNP

Hi, as you're new to Wikipedia I shan't place too much stock on your comment - "There was before you erased it, I'm not going to put it back in so that you can later erase in an attempt to whitewash things. You removed it for no apparent reason and now YOU put it back" - but I feel I should draw your attention to WP:Civil. Sad to say that arguments are easy to come by in this place and much easier to get into than get out of.

re: The comment. I've checked back on the history and you are right, I did delete a source. But it was not done "to whitewash" anything. My apologies.

All the same, I don't think that either the source or the parties listed in that statement warrant a place in the intro to the BNP. Maybe if those parties were of some note it would be fair enough. But I think most people will never have heard of them and so their views are - currently at least - unimportant. (Neither do I feel, for that matter, that Searchlight bit belongs in the intro. So it's not a question of bias).

As an idea perhaps the sentence could be put into a more appropriate part of the article? If you want to make that point why not put expand the point and put in a section on 'How the BNP are viewed by other far-right parties'? The article could probably benefit from that viewpoint. regards Marcus22 16:23, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ps It's normal to continue a discussion on the talk page it started on. So if you want to reply do so here and I will check back.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. - Rklawton 18:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As per the warning (which you removed) above, you have been blocked for violating the 3-revert rule. You were also pushing the bounds of civility in your edits as well. I suggest you take this time to read up on our editing rules. Cheers - Rklawton 18:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Due to your attempt at evading the above block (here and here) as well as continuing your edit war in the Nazi Germany article - I have extended your block to one week. If you continue along this line, you will quickly find yourself indefinitely banned from editing Wikipedia. Rklawton 02:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EXCUSE ME! You have proven yourself to be undeserving of your priveleges. USER; 68.222.34.149 IS NOT ME. You have extended my suspension and I think you blocked him for no reason. All this in your endeavor to censor something you dislike and of which the only evidence you have agianst is a biased source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AryeitskiySaldat (talk • contribs)

Read up on meat puppets. Rklawton 04:32, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I checked his IP adresse and he lives NOWHERE near me. You made a mistake, now I am asking you in a civilized manner to disengage that week-long suspension.

Suspected sock puppet

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Laderov (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Spylab 16:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Due to your attempt at evading the above block I have extended your block to one month. If you continue along this line, you will quickly find yourself indefinitely banned from editing Wikipedia. Rklawton 04:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]