User talk:Aschmitz

Test or vandalism removal?

Please don't test on my user subpages. Or maybe you were reverting what you thought to be vandalism, in which case I sincerely apologize. ♥ Fr ed il 02:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I sincerely apologize for that. I didn't intend to revert anything on a user page. I was RC patrolling and the diff that popups showed looked like vandalism. Because all popups showed was the subpage name, "Friends," it looked like something that needed quick reverting. Of course, the blame is entirely mine, I should have checked more closely. Rest assured that I'm now checking the pages I revert more carefully. Again, my apologies! Aschmitz 04:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

S'ok, I really don't like to blame people. Yeah, popups are a great tool, but they're really annoying if you get them wrong. Happy Holidays! ♥ Fr ed il 01:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:JHHS_Front.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:JHHS_Front.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 14:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rational number mis-revert

Hey - the reverts you made on this article unfortunately re-introduced vandalism (you over reverted). I performed a correct reversion — if popups are continuing to be a problem (noting the Dec.2006 discussion on your talk page), perhaps you might find TWINKLE a nicer thing. (I'll watch this page in case there is follow-up.) Quaeler (talk) 20:16, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I've added TWINKLE, so we'll see how that goes. I'll also get back into the habit of verifying my reverts when I make them. Thanks again. aschmitz (talk) 20:43, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]