User talk:Ash992478

March 2024[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at British Rail Class 458, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. For the last time, Flickr is not a reliable source. See WP:UGC. Danners430 (talk) 23:34, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No other forms of references are available at this time. The user who edited the page originally has provided photographic evidence. There is no need to keep on reverting their edits. Ash992478 (talk) 23:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there are no reliable references available, then the information doesn’t belong on Wikipedia - simple as that. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a news site. Danners430 (talk) 23:37, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia should have the current information shown, and be up to date, not many weeks/months behind. Ash992478 (talk) 23:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correct - if the information is sourced. See WP:VERIFIABILITY. Danners430 (talk) 23:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In your own words, tell me how a photo which very clearly shows a change is not a form of reliable proof. Ash992478 (talk) 23:44, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t have to explain anything - it’s policy. I’ve already linked the policies in play here. I suggest you read them. Danners430 (talk) 23:45, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I suggest people use some common sense. Ash992478 (talk) 23:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

best to take it up at a forum to discuss policy then… Danners430 (talk) 23:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have a life, so no thanks. Ash992478 (talk) 23:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing like getting shot down for trying to make the information up to date eh... Ash992478 (talk) 23:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]