User talk:Atoine85

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Babel user information
fr-N Cet utilisateur a pour langue maternelle le français.
en-4 This user has near native speaker knowledge of English.
de-2 Dieser Benutzer beherrscht Deutsch auf fortgeschrittenem Niveau.
la-2 Hic usor media Latinitate contribuere potest.
es-1 Este usuario tiene un conocimiento básico del español.
pt-0 Este utilizador não compreende português (ou compreende com dificuldades consideráveis).
it-0 Questo utente non è in grado di comunicare in italiano (o lo capisce solo con notevole difficoltà).
ro-0 Acest utilizator nu are cunoștințe de română (sau înțelege cu mare dificultate).
Users by language

Leave me a message here.

October 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm WikiPuppies. I noticed that you made a change to an article, European Union, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, WikiPuppies bark dig 18:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)


Hi Atoine! Can you please create an article on Chittagong in Latin language? I had previously created one with a translation tool but it got deleted because of poor translation. Thanks. --Zayeem (talk) 10:56, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

April 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Strike Eagle. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheStrikeΣagle 01:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Atoine85. You have new messages at Strike Eagle's talk page.
Message added 12:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Go ahead and make changes..I no longer give AF now... TheStrikeΣagle 12:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Comment there. Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 17:00, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eurozone may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:07, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Eurozone map[edit]

Hi, you reverted but 1) latvia is in eurozone now 2) you reverted croatia entry. Can you simply revert your revert? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 23:54, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

nowrap templates in infoboxes[edit]

Hello. The nowrap template you added to the infobox (containing 'Founded the EEC (now the') of EU member states has extended there widths and lengths unnecessarily, widening the left column and causing wraping in the right column. Ideally, the two columns should be about equal, so that the space is used most effectively. nowrap templates can help with this, if implemented correctly. See United Kingdom. If you're going to add a nowrap template to an infobox then you need to take into consideration other content in the infobox. For-example, at Luxembourg the right column was narrowed excessively due to your addition of the template in the left column. Alternatively, it may just widen the infobox if there's a nowrap template in the other column, which isn't much of an issue. Regards, Rob (talk | contribs) 20:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC)


When an edit of yours gets reverted, what you are supposed to do is you go to the talkpage and argue your case. You have been edit-warring; stop it and learn to behave the way people are expected to behave on this project. Fut.Perf. 19:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Greece shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 20:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)