User talk:AudreyS99/Blackbelly lanternshark

Andrew Gans Peer Review

I think you have done a fantastic job in rounding out the article. Based off of all the criteria you put into the spreadsheet, you definitely hit all the boxes morphology, taxonomy/phylogeny, habitat and diet. I think that all of those sections are appropriately sized and well balanced. My only suggestion would be to include more hyperlinks in the Diet and Habitat section for words that might not be super clear, like myctophids. Andrew.gans (talk) 19:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Russi Byun Peer Review

I think that you did a great job and added a lot of detail, and I really enjoyed reading the bioluminescence section. It was well organized, clear, and well cited. I think the citations for the diet and morphology sections can be cleaned up a bit more. I also think that the page itself should be reorganized for overall consistency, but it's a great draft so far. Olivesaregreen (talk) 03:12, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kate O'Hara Peer Review

I think you did a great job making this article more complete. I think that the sections on morphology, habitat, diet and taxonomy were well thought out and balanced. I think the organization of the page could be improved just to make the article a bit more consistent and flow a little better.