User talk:Audrey Buck/Quantum biology

I couldn't edit the peer review page so here is my peer review:

Whose work are you reviewing? Audrey Buck
   Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Audrey Buck/Quantum Biology

Guiding questions:

   Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes
   Is the content added up-to-date? Yes
   Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Content fits
   Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Yes

Content evaluation Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

   Is the content added neutral? Yes
   Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No
   Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No
   Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No

Tone and balance evaluation Sources and References

Guiding questions:

   Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes
   Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes
   Are the sources current? Yes
   Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Yes
   Check a few links. Do they work? Yes

Sources and references evaluation Organization

Guiding questions:

   Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes
   Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
   Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes

Organization evaluation

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

   Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes
   What are the strengths of the content added? Very clear information.
   How can the content added be improved? Possibly add some more images